Detailed analytics regarding sexual behavior of the full take to and you will the three subsamples off productive pages, previous users, and non-pages
Becoming unmarried decreases the amount of unprotected complete sexual intercourses
In regard to the number of partners with whom participants had protected full sex during the last year, the ANOVA revealed a significant difference between user groups (F(dos, 1144) = , P 2 = , Cramer’s V = 0.15, P Figure 1 represents the theoretical model and the estimate coefficients. The model fit indices are the following: ? 2 = , df = 11, P 27 the fit indices of our model are not very satisfactory; however, the estimate coefficients of the model resulted statistically significant for several variables, highlighting interesting results and in line with the reference literature. In Table 4 , estimated regression weights are reported. The SEM output showed that being active or former user, compared to being non-user, has a positive statistically significant effect on the number of unprotected full sexual intercourses in the last 12 months. The same is for the age. All the other independent variables do not have a statistically significant impact.
Returns from linear regression model entering group, relationship applications use and you may intentions out of installations parameters since the predictors getting exactly how many safe full sexual intercourse‘ people certainly one of productive users
Productivity off linear regression design typing demographic, dating applications utilize and you will objectives of installation details since the predictors to possess what number of safe full sexual intercourse‘ partners among active users
Hypothesis 2b A second multiple regression analysis was run to predict the number of unprotected full sex partners for active users. The number of unprotected full sex partners was set as the dependent variable, while the same demographic variables and dating apps usage and their motives for app installation variables used in the first regression analysis were entered as covariates. The final model accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in the number of unprotected full sex partners among active users (R 2 = 0.16, Adjusted R 2 = 0.14, F-change(step one, 260) = 4.34, P = .038). In contrast, looking for romantic partners or for friends, and being male were negatively associated with the number of unprotected sexual activity partners. Results are reported in Table 6 .
Looking sexual couples, many years of application application, and being heterosexual was indeed surely associated with the quantity of unprotected full sex partners
Production of linear regression model typing group, dating software utilize and you will intentions of setting up variables while the predictors to possess what amount of unprotected complete sexual intercourse‘ partners certainly one of active pages
Searching for sexual people, numerous years of application use, and being heterosexual were certainly associated with the number of unprotected full sex people
Efficiency out-of linear regression model entering group, matchmaking apps need and purposes out-of set up details since predictors having the number of exposed complete sexual intercourse‘ lovers one of productive profiles
Hypothesis 2c A third multiple regression analysis was run, including demographic variables and apps‘ pattern of usage variables together with apps‘ installation motives, to predict active users‘ hook-up frequency. The hook-up frequency was set as the dependent variable, while the same demographic variables and dating apps usage variables used in the previous regression analyses were entered as predictors. The final model accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in hook-up frequency among active users (R 2 = 0.24, Adjusted R 2 = 0.23, F-change(step 1, 266) = 5.30, P = .022). App access hot eastern european women frequency, looking for sexual partners, having a CNM relationship style were positively associated with the frequency of hook-ups. In contrast, being heterosexual and being of another sexual orientation (different from hetero and homosexual orientation) were negatively associated with the frequency of hook-ups. Results are reported in Table 7 .
